State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Baumruk · State v. Bolder · State of Missouri v. Amanda N. Bazell · State v. Anderson · State v. Hurst
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the defendant waived the objection; (2) the State intended to surprise the defendant, or acted deceptively or in bad faith with the intention of causing disadvantage; (3) the defendant was, in fact, surprised and suffered disadvantage; and (4) the type of testimony presented might have been readily contemplated by the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Chaidez“Regarding a late-endorsed witness, we will find an abuse of discretion only where the admission of testimony 'results in fundamental unfairness to the defendant.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Chaidez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.