Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 536 A2D 1134 - Warren v. Nolan

Warren v. Nolan’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1995
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Darling v. Augusta Mental Health Institute · Finn v. Lipman · Peoples Heritage Bank v. City of Saco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Notice requirements for filing. Within 180 days after a cause of action against a governmental entity accrues, or at a later time within the limits of section 8110, when a claimant shows good cause why notice could not have reasonably been filed within the 180-day limit, a claimant or his personal representative shall file a written notice ... [[Image here]] 4. Substantial notice compliance required. No claim or action shall be commenced against a governmental entity or employee in the Superior Court unless the foregoing notice provisions are substantially complied with.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.