Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 536 F.2d 1156 - Tracy Sidle v. William C. Majors

Tracy Sidle v. William C. Majors’s Empirical Analysis

536 F.2d 1156 · 1976

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2015

11 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

12019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Dandridge v. Williams · Reed v. Reed · Hicks v. Miranda · Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . Therefore, despite our doubts about the current validity of the rule in Silver v. Silver, supra, we are obligated to affirm. Hicks v. Miranda, supra, 422 U.S. at 345 , 95 S.Ct. at 2290, 45 L.Ed.2d at 236 . Although we are the first court of appeals to consider the equal protection challenge to a guest statute, the high courts of several states have already grappled with the problem, and the split among them has been noted (supra p. 1159). Indeed the Supreme Courts of Nevada and New Mexico invalidated their states’ guest statutes after the Supreme Court of the United States acted in Cannon. See Laakonen v. Eighth Judicial District Court, supra; McGeehan v. Bunch, supra [ 88 N.M. 308 , 540 P.2d 238 (1975)]. The frequency with which the question has arisen and the disagreement among the high courts of several states attests to the importance of the issue, its difficulty and the need for conclusive resolution so that the present viability of Silver v. Silver can be authoritatively determined.” Sidle v. Majors, 536 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir. 1976) at 1160.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “1. Does the Indiana Guest Statute contravene Article 1, Section 12 of the Indiana Constitution?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “2. Does said Act contravene Article 1, Section 23 of the Indiana Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.