Marsh v. Cupp’s Empirical Analysis
536 F.2d 1287 · 1976
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 1994 · most notably United States v. Ramirez (1988), United States v. Seawell (1977)
23 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cupp v. Naughten · Brasfield v. United States · Jenkins v. United States · United States v. See · United States v. Marshall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in its context and under all the circumstances the judge's statement had the coercive effect attributed to it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ellis v. Reed · Jimenez v. Myers“Now, I am not going to accept this. You have got to reach a decision in this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ellis v. Reed
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.