Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 536 F.2d 1320 - Smith v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.

Smith v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

536 F.2d 1320 · 1976

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
December 2015
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2015

13 federal appellate · 6 district ·

12019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1985

Relies on Griffin v. Breckenridge · Carter v. Stanton · Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. Sargent · 356 F. Supp. 904 - Johnston v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc. · McIntosh v. Garofalo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If, on a motion asserting the defense numbered (6) to dismiss for failure of the pleading to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, matters outside the pleading are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56, and all parties shall be given reasonable opportunity to present all material made pertinent to such a motion by Rule 56.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “functional equivalent of a motion to dismiss.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.