United States v. Peter A. Crusco and Phillip A. Cimmino. Appeal of Phillip Cimmino’s Empirical Analysis
536 F.2d 21 · 1976
Citation profile
99 federal appellate · 8 district · 37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 174 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably United States v. Moore (1991), United States v. Harvey (1986)
99 federal appellate · 8 district · 37 state decisions — followed in 20 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Santobello v. New York · McCarthy v. United States · Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Northeast Airlines, Inc. · G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United States · In re Disbarment of Levin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 174 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as a transparent effort to influence the severity of [the defendant's] sentence”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(w)here the record shows that 'circumstances as they existed at the time of the guilty plea, judged by objective standards, reasonably justified his mistaken impression,' a defendant must be held to have entered his plea without full knowledge of the consequences and involuntarily.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“However, cases of disappointed but unfounded expectations must be carefully distinguished from those in which the defendant's expectations as to his sentence are predicated upon promises by the Government or statements from the court.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.