Hagans v. Berger’s Empirical Analysis
536 F.2d 525 · 1976
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 606 (§ 406 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · Hagans v. Lavine · Rosado v. Wyman · King v. Smith · Jefferson v. Hackney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to remedy the anticipated demands created as the result of everyday life,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davis v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.