United States v. Payden’s Empirical Analysis
536 F.2d 541 · 1976
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Marion · Gerry v. United States · Hampton v. United States · Bruce v. United States · United States v. Finkelstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Payden has not demonstrated any prejudice to himself because of the delays, which would be necessary to show a violation of his rights. See e. g. United States v. Marion, [citation omitted].” 536 F.2d at 544 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.