Miller v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
536 F.2d 967 · 1976
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1993
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Picard v. Connor · Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky · John Henry Hewett v. State of North Carolina, R. L. Turner, Warden, Central Prison, Jerry Ray Cassada v. State of North Carolina · United States v. Belculfine · United States ex rel. Levy v. McMann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As the Supreme Court has said in another context: “It follows, of course, that once the federal claim has been fairly presented to the state courts, the exhaustion requirement is satisfied.” Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270, 275 , 92 S.Ct. 509, 512 [ 30 L.Ed.2d 438 ] (1971). If the petition is denied on the merits, no state process will be interrupted. If the petition is meritorious, the “need to preserve the writ of habeas corpus as a ‘swift and imperative remedy in all cases of illegal restraint or confinement’ ” comes into full play, and in the normal ease will outweigh the interests of federalism opposing it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The very fact of exhaustion means that the state courts have ruled, or have had the chance to rule on the federal claim in the first instance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the issues before the federal court logically depend for their relevance upon resolution of an unexhausted issue,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rose v. Lundy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.