Preminger v. Peake’s Empirical Analysis
536 F.3d 1000 · 2008
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n · United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP) · Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. · Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] restriction on expressive conduct in a nonpublic forum must be viewpoint neutral[,] [b]ut in a nonpublic forum, the government has 'the right to make distinctions in access on the basis of subject matter and speaker identity,' as long as the distinctions are not 'an effort to suppress expression merely because public officials oppose the speaker's view'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.