Young v. Repine’s Empirical Analysis
536 F.3d 512 · 2008
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Sternberg v. Johnston (2009), Campbell v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (2008)
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on L & A Contracting Company v. Southern Concrete Services, Inc. · Knaus v. Concordia Lumber Co. · Fleet Mortgage Group, Inc. v. Kaneb · Aiello v. Providian Financial Corp. · Cadle Co. v. Pratt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]t minimum, Repine was required to set forth ‘specific information' concerning the damages caused by his emotional distress rather than relying only on 'generalized assertions.’ ”) (quoting Fleet Mortg. Group, Inc. v. Kaneb, 196 F.3d 265, 269 (1st Cir.1999)); see generally In re Snowden, 769 F.3d 651, 656-57 (9th Cir.2014) (explaining that emotional distress damages are only recoverable under § 362(k)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the commencement or continuation, including the issuance or employment of process of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been commenced before the commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this title”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Medina“We review the Bankruptcy Court’s findings of fact for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo, as did the District Court. In re Pratt, 524 F.3d 580, 584 (5th Cir.2008). We review a Bankruptcy Court’s evidentiary rulings under an abuse of discretion standard. In re SGSM Acquisition Co., LLC, 439 F.3d 233, 239 (5th Cir.2006).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.