Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 536 F.3d 651 - Evers v. Astrue

Evers v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis

536 F.3d 651 · 2008

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
March 2023
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of Reclamation (2010), Apex Digital, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (2009)

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

350200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 41 U.S.C. § 601 (Contract Disputes Act of 1978) · 41 U.S.C. § 602 · 41 U.S.C. § 605 · 41 U.S.C. § 606

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Paul v. Davis · Powell v. McCormack · Brown v. General Services Administration

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “district court may properly look beyond the jurisdictional allegations of the complaint and view whatever evidence has been submitted on the issue to determine whether in fact subject matter jurisdiction exists” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)). However, the court does not rely upon them in analyzing defendants’ motion under Rule 12(b)(6), which includes whether the facts alleged in the complaint meet the .statutory definition of .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.