536 F. Supp. 2d 1129 - In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (Dram) Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters · Atlantic Richfield Company v. Usa Petroleum Company · Blue Shield of Va. v. McCready
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To satisfy the consumer-oriented prong, plaintiffs need only allege consumer-oriented conduct that implicates the public interest in New York.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“offend[s] public policy as has been established by statute and/or common law”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the plaintiff suffered injury as a result of the deceptive act.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.