536 F. Supp. 2d 595 - Glynn v. Edo Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 2409 · 18 U.S.C. § 1513 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 31 U.S.C. § 3730 (False Claims Act)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Shaffer v. Heitner · Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. · Pennoyer v. Neff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(e) Whoever knowingly, with the intent to retaliate, takes any action harmful to any person, including interference with the lawful employment or livelihood of any person, for providing to a law enforcement officer any truthful information relating to the commission or possible commission of any Federal offense, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lawson v. FMR LLC“failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” To survive a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6),”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Glynn v. Edo Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.