Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 536 N.E.2d 516 - Doss v. State

Doss v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2008

4 state decisions

20198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Elmore v. State · Lopez v. State · Clem v. State · Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the evidence may have been admissible, its exclusion constitutes reversible error only if it is demonstrated that the error resulted in such prejudice that the appellant was denied a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.