Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 536 P.2d 373 - Combs v. State

Combs v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 1975
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hamling v. United States · Roth v. United States · Miller v. California · Bouie v. City of Columbia · Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““You are further instructed that the laws of the State of Oklahoma do not prohibit the sale of such material meeting the following standards: 1. Pursuant to medical prescription or for use in any recognized school of medicine or veterinary science for education purpose. 2. If the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would not find that the material, taken as a whole, appeals to one’s prurient interest. A. In applying contemporary community standards the material’s impact on an average person must be determined, not the impact on a particularly susceptible or sensitive person, or, indeed, a totally insensitive one. B. Prurient is defined by Funk & Wagnalls dictionary as: 1. Impure in thought and desire; lewd. 2. Having lustful cravings or desires. 3. Longing, desirous. 3. If the depiction, otherwise prohibited by the State Law, of sexual conduct, is not so depicted in a patently offensive way. 4. If the material, taken as a whole, is of literary, political, artistic or scientific value. If, after considering all of the evidence, whether introduced by the State or by the defendant, you find that the sale of State’s Exhibit No. 1 is not prohibited by reason of falling within one of the above categories, or if you have a reasonable doubt in this regard, it is your duty to resolve this case in favor of the defendant and acquit him.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Any person who knowingly buys, sells, barters, traffics in, or causes to be delivered or transported in Oklahoma, any picture, moving picture ... of any person . . . in an act or acts of sexual intercourse or unnatural copulation shall be deemed guilty of a felony,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.