Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

536 So. 2d 1064

536 So.2d 1064

13 Fla.L.Weekly 2447

Patnode v. Patnode

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 4, 1988

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-11-04

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris

Decided 1988-11-04

PER CURIAM.

¶1After reviewing the entire record in this matter, we construe the trial court’s order concerning attorney’s fees to be a determination that the sum of $3000 was a reason*1065able attorney’s fee for legal services provided to the appellant subsequent to a temporary order concerning fees. This construction results in a determination that a reasonable attorney’s fee for the entire proceeding was $6500 and that the appellee was required to pay $3500 of that amount. As so construed, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and, accordingly, affirm. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and HALL, JJ., concur.
/536/so2d/1064 · .json · Public domain