Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 536 So. 2d 206 - Perez v. State

536 So. 2d 206 - Perez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
6
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably 536 So. 2d 212 - Glendening v. State (1988), Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Edgar L. (1997)

61 state decisions

3501988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Bourjaily v. United States · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the mental and physical age and maturity of the child, the nature and duration of the abuse or offense, the relationship of the child to the offender, the reliability of the assertion, the reliability of the child victim, and any other factor deemed appropriate.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “that the trial court find that the time, content, and circumstances of the statement provide sufficient safeguards of reliability furnishes a sufficient guarantee of trustworthiness of the hearsay statement”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the time, content and circumstances of the statement provide sufficient safeguards of reliability”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.