536 So. 2d 541 - Johnson v. Odom’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “G. The court may affirm the decision of the agency or remand the case for further proceedings. The court may reverse or modify the decision if substantial rights of the appellant have been prejudiced because the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions are: (1) In violation of constitutional or statutory provisions; (2) In excess of the statutory authority of the agency; (3) Made upon unlawful procedure; (4) Affected by other error of law; (5) Arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion; or (6) Manifestly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence on the whole record....”

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Segura v. Louisiana State Racing Com'n · Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Louisiana Tax Com'n

2. “The manifest error test [of subsection G] is used in reviewing the facts found by the agency, [whereas,] the arbitrariness test [is] used in reviewing conclusions and exercises of agency discretion.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Segura v. Louisiana State Racing Com'n · Warren Energy Resources v. La. Tax Com'n