Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 536 So. 2d 909 - Moore v. State

536 So. 2d 909 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2009

13 state decisions

110198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 437 So. 2d 19 - Box v. State · 436 So. 2d 1381 - Morris v. State · 460 So. 2d 126 - Barnes v. State · Evangeline Medical & X-Ray Distributors Corp. v. Jackson-Hinds Comprehensive Health Center · Foster v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The question presented here brings into direct conflict two important interests. First there is prosecution's interest in presenting to the jury all relevant, probative evidence. On the other hand, there is the accused's interest in knowing reasonably well in advance of trial what the prosecution will try to prove and how it will attempt to make its proof which, of course, includes the names of persons the state expects to call as witnesses. This state is committed to the proposition that these conflicting interests are best accommodated and that justice is more nearly achieved when, well in advance of trial, each side has reasonable access to the evidence of the other. See Rule 4.06 supra; Rules 26-37, Miss. R.Civ.P.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “trigger[s] the state's obligation to produce discovery under Rule 4.06.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.