536 So. 2d 99 - Pugh v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 1999
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · McMann v. Richardson · Michel v. State of Louisiana Poret · Mylar v. State Alabama · 410 So. 2d 449 - Craig v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether a defendant possessed the intent to permanently deprive another of his property is a jury question. . . . Absent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, the jury's finding will not be reversed on appeal. . . . We are not in the business of being substitute jurors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[the appellant] argues that he merely kept the video equipment beyond his lease period and that he intended to eventually return the equipment to National Video.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`[a]bsent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, the jury's finding will not be reversed on appeal.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.