Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 536 SW2D 328 - State v. Beasley

State v. Beasley’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2008

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

501976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 12 Cal. 3d 486 - People v. Reyes · State v. Noell · Smith v. State · State v. Nelson · Wooten v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “defendants or defense witnesses were allowed, if based upon evidence in the record. Id. at 330 . There were a few instances when the district attorney's remarks were not supported by any direct evidence, such as the comment that he didn't”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.