Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 1991
2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Britt v. North Carolina · Smith v. State · Brown v. State · Hill v. State · Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although appellant could have studied the record of the mistrial as an aid to appellate strategy, he had the alternative available of asking the trial counsel about testimony or conduct at the first trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. Estelle“Evidently the trial counsel saw no need of the record either for discovery purposes or for the impeachment of witnesses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. Estelle“There is no showing that (Jackson) was harmed in this instance by the denial of the transcript.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. Estelle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.