Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

536 S.W.2d 507

Maupin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1976

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1976-04-21

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1976-04-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2005

6 state decisions

201976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BILLINGS, Chief Judge.

¶1Appellant Maupin has appealed from a denial of his Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., motion to vacate judgment and sentence.

¶2This appeal is a companion case to Gibson v. State, decided this date, and since the appellant has pending in this Court a direct appeal from the conviction he seeks to attack under Rule 27.26 he cannot invoke post-conviction remedies until his appeal is determined. Rule 27.26(b), (2).

¶3For the reasons set forth in Gibson v. State, the state’s motion to dismiss this appeal is sustained and the appeal is dismissed.

All concur.
/536/sw2d/507 · .json · Public domain