Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

537 A.2d 1131

Hornstein v. Barry

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1988

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 1988-02-19

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1989

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relies on Hornstein v. Barry

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-02-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2On consideration of appellees’ petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, and the response thereto, it is

¶3ORDERED by the merits division ’ that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

¶4FURTHER ORDERED that appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of September 11,1987, 530 A.2d 1177, are hereby vacated. It is

¶5FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before February 29, 1988.

/537/a2d/1131 · .json · Public domain