In Re Harry W. Rodgers, III’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2024
1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Union Leader Corp. · Rosen v. Sugarman · Green v. Murphy · Yablonski v. United Mine Workers of America · Pfizer Inc. v. Lord
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This is so because the actual case before the court consists of more than the charges brought by the government. It also includes the defense asserted by the accused. Here, this defense, in part at least, will consist of evidence of matters in which the judge’s former partner served as a lawyer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“attempt to use the [judge's former law] partner and his client as witnesses to prove that their goals [in obtaining passage of the bill] were identical and legitimate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“will undoubtedly testify about the events that took place before the judge withdrew from his law firm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.