Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 537 F.2d 246 - Van Winkle v. McLucas

Van Winkle v. McLucas’s Empirical Analysis

537 F.2d 246 · 1976

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2012

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

6019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co. · United States v. Alcea Band · United States v. Goltra · Gray v. Dukedom Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * * * (1) is entitled, on correction of the personnel action, to receive for the period for which the personnel action was in effect an amount equal to all or any part of the pay, allowances, or differentials, as applicable, that the employee normally would have earned during that period if the personnel action had not occurred, less any amounts earned by him through other employment during that period; . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We believe that the award of interest must be reversed. The Back Pay Act is quite detailed in the relief it affords. Obviously, Congress could have added the award of interest to the remedies which it did provide. Since the Back Pay Act creates a cause of action against the sovereign which did not previously exist, a strict construction of the statutory remedy is generally held to be required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.