Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 537 F.2d 67 - North Carolina v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.

North Carolina v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

537 F.2d 67 · 1976

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
June 1995
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 1995 · most notably United States v. Pfizer Inc. (1977), 10 Cal. 4th 257 - Manufacturers Life Insurance v. Superior Court (1995)

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

230197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation · Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp. · United States v. Morgan · United States v. District Court · 19 Cal. 2d 807 - Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Association

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No order of the Commission or judgment of court to enforce the same shall in anywise relieve or absolve any person, partnership, or corporation from any liability under the Antitrust Acts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(Italics added.) The ultimate source of Insurance Code section 790.09 is section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, section 45(e) of title 15 of the United States Code:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.