Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 537 F.2d 747 - Ethel Hazo v. Margaret E. Geltz

Ethel Hazo v. Margaret E. Geltz’s Empirical Analysis

537 F.2d 747 · 1976

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2005 · most notably Dennis v. Sparks (1980), Henry v. Farmer City State Bank (1986)

11 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

1401976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Monroe v. Pape · Paul v. Davis · Imbler v. Pachtman · Pierson v. Ray · Griffin v. Breckenridge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As the record now stands, we cannot assess whether Deputy Sheriff Telford’s alleged conduct could sustain a cause of action. We do not know to what extent the procedures requiring or allowing the refusal [or acceptance] of the [bid], the type of sale notice, and the service of process are directly supervised and sanctioned by the bench. It may be that these procedures have been developed as a matter of administrative convenience, not under direct judicial supervision. In short, this case could be a qualified immunity case.” 537 F.2d at 751 (emphasis in original).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.