Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 537 F.2d 784 - Ira GISSEN, Appellant, v. Arthur L. TACKMAN Et Al.

Ira GISSEN, Appellant, v. Arthur L. TACKMAN Et Al.’s Empirical Analysis

537 F.2d 784 · 1976

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
2
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 15 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably Egger v. Phillips (1983), Kizas v. Webster (1983)

12 federal appellate · 15 district · 2 state decisions

22019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. General Services Administration · Barr v. Matteo · Naporano Metal And Iron Company v. Secretary Of Labor Of The United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The legislative history thus leaves little doubt that Congress was persuaded that federal employees who were treated discriminatorily had no effective judicial remedy. And .the case law suggests that that conclusion was entirely reasonable. [T]he relevant inquiry is not whether Congress correctly perceived the then state of the law, but rather what its perception of the state of the law was. This unambiguous congressional perception seems to indicate that the congressional intent in 1972 was to create an exclusive, pre-emptive administrative and judicial scheme for the redress of federal employment discrimination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.