Israel v. Chabra’s Empirical Analysis
537 F.3d 86 · 2008
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2022
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. · Muzak Corp. v. Hotel Taft Corp. · Rentways, Inc. v. O'Neill Milk & Cream Co. · Mencher v. Weiss · Salzman Sign Co. v. Beck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Surinder (Sonny) Chabra (“Guarantor”) hereby absolutely, unconditionally and irrevocably guarantees to Israel (i) the full, due and punctual payment, whether at stated payment dates, by acceleration or otherwise, of any amounts owed under Section 3.4 of the Employment Agreement (including interest as described therein), and (ii) the prompt reimbursement of or payment for any and all ... expenses and liabilities (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) incurred by Israel in enforcing any rights under this Guaranty (collectively, the “Obligations”), and further guaranteed that any such amounts shall be paid when due without presentation, demand, notice or protest of any kind with the same effect as though the Guarantor was AMC in and for the purposes of Section 3.4 of the Employment Agreement; provided, however, that Israel has given Guarantor written notice (“Notice”) of AMC’s failure to pay any Obligation within 60 days of the occurrence of each failure. Guarantor will then have 30 days to make such payments (or to cause AMC to make such payments). ... The liability of the Guarantor under this Guaranty shall be absolute and unconditional irrespective of ... any change in the time, manner or place of payment of, or in any other term of, all or any of such provisions or the Obligations .... ... The Guarantor hereby waives promptness, diligence, dishonor, default, forbearance, notice of acceptance and any other notice with respect to any of the Obligations and this Guaranty, excep”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Israel v. Chabra“Does New York General Obligations Law § 15-301(1) abrogate, in the case of a contract where the second of two irreconcilable provisions requires that any modifications to the agreement be made in writing, the common law rule that where two contractual provisions are irreconcilable, the one appearing first in the contract is to be given effect rather than the one appearing subsequent?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Israel v. Chabra“`this Court may certify to the highest court of a state an unsettled and significant question of state law that will control the outcome of a case pending before this Court.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.