Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 537 F. Supp. 2d 1095 - Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.

537 F. Supp. 2d 1095 - Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
June 2008
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. · Robert Devereaux v. Timothy David Abbey · Odetics Inc v. Storage Technology Corporation Visa International Service Association Inc Visa Usa Inc Crestar Bank Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a digital image display system: a memory for storing color data values; processing means responsive to a predetermined command and data sequence comprising at least one command, the processing means decoding the predetermined command and data sequence the predetermined command and data sequence selecting one of a plurality of modes of access to color data values, the modes comprising: a first mode of access wherein an in-use foreground color is directly specified as a color data value; a second mode of access wherein the in-use foreground color is specified as an index into the color memory; and a third mode of access wherein the in-use foreground color and an in-use background color are specified as indexes into the color memory; and display means responsive to the processing means, the display means displaying the colors associated with the color data values accessed by the selected mode.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “indicating a particular one of said information fields into which information is to be inserted and for concurrently displaying a predefined tool associated with said one of said fields, said predefined tool being operable to supply information of the kind identified for said one field said tool being selected from a group of predefined tools including a tool adapted to supply an individual entry from a menu of alternatives and at least a tool adapted to allow said user to compose said information.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.