Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 537 NE2D 501 - Kiger v. State

Kiger v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Woods v. State · Mattingly v. State · Adams v. State · Cambridge v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he issue of sufficiency of the evidence in Kiger’s trial has already been litigated. The decision was adverse to Kiger. He may not relitigate it through post-conviction procedures.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.