Beavers v. Walters’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2022
1 federal appellate · 4 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lehman Bros. v. Lilly · Wall v. Lewis · State v. Haakenson · State v. Moore · State v. Himmerick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““For an effective appeal on an issue, the issue must first have been ‘appropriately-raised in the trial court so that the trial court could have ruled upon it ... otherwise, it would behoove a defendant to sit by and invite error in the hope that if he did not prevail the first time, he would prevail upon appellate review of invited error.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Messer v. Bender
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.