Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 537 NW2D 8 - Bosse v. Quam

Bosse v. Quam’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2016

1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

130199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schoenrock v. Tappe · Miller v. Stevens · Muller v. Sturman · Dacy v. Gors · Boone v. C. Arthur Weaver Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the area of medical malpractice ... this court has carved an exception to the statute of limitation[ ]. This exception prevents the statute of limitatio&s clock from ticking when the alleged harm is the result of a continuing tort. See [Wells, 391 N.W.2d 668 ]; [Alberts, 299 N.W.2d 454 ], In Wells, the court tolled the statute of limitation[ ] for torts arising out of a physician’s “continuing treatment” until the doctor-patient relationship ended. [Wells, 391 N.W.2d at 673 .] The rationale behind this doctrine was to prevent the refusal to seek or administer health care due to pending litigation when treatment may be desperately needed. [Id. at 672.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]n action against a physician, surgeon, dentist, hospital, sanitarium, registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, chiropractor, or other practitioner of the healing arts for malpractice, error, mistake or failure to cure, whether based upon contract or tort, can be commenced only within tivo years after the alleged malpractice, error, mistake or failure to cure shall have occurred .... (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]e will affirm only when the legal questions have been correctly decided and there is no genuine issue of material fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.