State v. Iaukea’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably State v. Pinero (1989), State v. Estrada (1987)
69 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Trop v. Dulles · Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell · People v. . Molineux · 28 Cal. 2d 306 - People v. Peete · State v. Spreigl
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The responsibility for maintaining the delicate balance between probative value and prejudicial effect lies largely within the discretion of the trial court.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Palisbo · State v. Maluia“It was important that the jury know all of the facts involved so that they would not mistakenly construe the complaining witness' calm manner and lack of screaming as indicative of consent or lack of forcible compulsion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The law does not require that the use of force or the threatened imminent use of force be done for the very purpose of taking the victim’s property. If you find that the defendant, while armed . .. threatened the imminent use of force for the purpose of sexual intercourse or deviate sexual intercourse, and that he later formed the design to take the property, you may find that he threatened the imminent use of force with intent to compel acquiescence to the taking of the property.” [State v. Iaukea, 56 Haw. 343, 356 , 537 P.2d 724, 733 (1975).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stebbing v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.