Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

537 So. 2d 1056

537 So.2d 1056

14 Fla.L.Weekly 217

Barfield v. Schmon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 18, 1989

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-01-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1993

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“foreign personal representatives have standing and capacity to bring an action in Florida for the wrongful death of their decedent. . . without complying with Florida's probate statutes pertaining to ancillary administration.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Rhoads v. Newman Enterprises, No. Cv93 0522545 (Oct. 7, 1993)

“by the decedent's personal representative”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Rhoads v. Newman Enterprises, No. Cv93 0522545 (Oct. 7, 1993)

Relies on Ott v. Keller · Walton v. State ex rel. Road Commission · In Re Fla. Rules of Judicial Administration

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-01-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HERSEY, Chief Judge.

¶1In this action brought under Florida’s Wrongful Death Act, sections 768.16-768.27, Florida Statutes (1987), appellant challenges the right of appellees, as foreign personal representatives, to bring an action under this statute without complying with Florida’s probate statutes pertaining to ancillary administration. Put more directly, the issue is whether foreign personal representatives have standing and capacity to bring an action in Florida for the wrongful death of their decedent. We answer in the affirmative in what appears to be a case of first impression in Florida.

¶2Other jurisdictions are in disagreement on this issue. Some permit an action to be pursued by a foreign personal representative. See Rotella v. Joseph, 615 S.W.2d 616 (Mo.Ct.App.1981); Torres v. Sierra, 89 N.M. 441, 553 P.2d 721 (1976), cert. denied, 90 N.M. 8, 558 P.2d 620 (1976). Others do not. See, e.g., Burcl v. North Carolina Baptist Hospital, Inc., 306 N.C. 214, 293 S.E.2d 85 (1982); Barragan v. Superior Court of Pima County, 12 Ariz.App. 402, 470 P.2d 722 (1970).

¶3Florida’s Wrongful Death Act provides simply that an action under the Act shall be brought “by the decedent’s personal representative,” without any limiting language or definitions. § 768.20, Fla.Stat. (1987).

¶4The Florida Probate Code, section 734.-101(1), Florida Statutes (1987), provides that actions may be maintained in the courts of this state by “[pjersonal representatives who produce authenticated copies of probated wills or letters of administration duly obtained in any state or territory of the United States....”

¶5We think it is therefore clear that a foreign personal representative may file and maintain a wrongful death action in the courts of this state. See also Sempe v. Coordinated Caribbean Transport, Inc., 363 So.2d 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 372 So.2d 467 (Fla.1979).

¶6The order appealed is affirmed and the cause remanded for further appropriate proceedings; provided, only, that appellees file, for the approval of the trial court, duly authenticated letters of their administration or such duly authenticated documents as may serve a similar function in the issuing jurisdiction.

¶7AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
/537/so2d/1056 · .json · Public domain