Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 537 So. 2d 652 - McLane v. Rose

537 So. 2d 652 - McLane v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2014

14 state decisions

601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Griffin v. Texas · 471 So. 2d 38 - The Florida Bar in Re Inglis · 438 So. 2d 380 - Lightbourne v. State · 432 So. 2d 1382 - In Re App. 48,900 Dollars in US Currency

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whenever any law enforcement officer of this state encounters any person under circumstances which reasonably indicate that such person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a violation of the criminal laws of this state or the criminal ordinances of any municipality or county, the officer may temporarily detain such person for the purpose of ascertaining the identity of the person temporarily detained and the circumstances surrounding the person's presence abroad which led the officer to believe that the person had committed, was committing, or was about to commit a criminal offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “evidence uncovered in violation of the fourth amendment ... must be excluded from consideration in civil forfeiture proceedings”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.