Lynn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 27, 1989

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-01-27

Relies on Anders v. California

Decided 1989-01-27

PER CURIAM.

¶1The Public Defender filed an Anders1brief and the appellant filed a short pro se brief.

¶2At sentencing of the defendant in the instant case (trial court case #87-4695), the court announced that the sentences imposed were to run concurrent with the sentence imposed in a previous case (trial *692court case # 87-2255). However, the written sentence omits such provision for concurrency. On remand, the trial court shall amend to provide for such concurrency.

¶3We affirm the judgments and sentences but remand for the purpose stated above.

SMITH, C.J., and ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

¶4. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).