¶1The state concedes that the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant as an habitual offender because the trial court’s oral pronouncements were not supported by written, specific findings of fact. We, therefore, remand for the trial court to set forth a written factual basis for its habitual offender determination and to resen-tence the defendant. Watson v. State, 492 So.2d 831 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).
537 So. 2d 696
Link v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 31, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-01-31
Relies on 492 So. 2d 831 - Watson v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1989-01-31
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2006
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →