Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

537 So. 2d 706

537 So.2d 706

14 Fla.L.Weekly 308

Bostick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 1, 1989

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-02-01

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-02-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2009

9 state decisions

80198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ERVIN, Judge.

¶1Appellant, charged in Count I of an information with manslaughter, by hitting the victim with a motor vehicle, and in Count II with grand theft, was found guilty by the jury of the lesser offense of culpable negligence by causing injury, a first degree misdemeanor, and grand theft. Following the trial, appellant moved and was granted a new trial on the grand theft charge only, and the case as to that offense is still pending. The judgment of guilt, however, reflects that appellant was found guilty of the offense of “CT. 1, GRAND THEFT,” rather than the offense of culpable negligence. This is error because appellant was granted a new trial on the grand theft charge.

¶2The judgment is REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for entry of a corrected judgment.

SMITH, C.J., and NIMMONS, J., concur.
/537/so2d/706 · .json · Public domain