Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 537 S.W.2d 755 - Conrad v. State

Conrad v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
October 1999
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently October 1999

23 state decisions

120197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Douglas v. People of State of California · Foley v. State · Simmons v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Parents of appellant are not legally-bound to pay for the expenses of an appeal. ... Sometimes parents run out of funds and cannot help a child who has been charged with committing crimes. In some cases parents may have funds but will not furnish them for counsel and for the record. If they have money, this does not mean that a defendant is not indigent.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““There are no standards set out for guidance to trial judges in determining the actual indigency of a defendant for the purposes of appeal. See Article 40.-09(5), V.A.C.C.P. Each case must be decided upon its facts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.