Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 537 SW3D 113 - Prine v. State

Prine v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston))

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Thompson v. State · McFarland v. State · Bone v. State · Rylander v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “so outrageous that no competent attorney would have engaged in it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.