Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 537 SW3D 19 - State v. Ford

State v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District)

Relationships

Relies on Rawlings v. Kentucky · Guzman v. State · Virginia v. Moore · State v. Ross · Carmouche v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] customer of a store can exercise control over property with intent to deprive, even if the customer has not yet left the store with the property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.