Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 537 SW3D 39 - Ex parte St. Aubin

Ex parte St. Aubin’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston))

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Ohio · Abney v. United States · United States v. Broce · Ball v. United States · Sanabria v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “at the very least, that the alleged constitutional violation occur at or before a finding of guilt”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “differentiation of multiple-punishments and successive-prosecution double jeopardy rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “the current claims and issues have not been and could not have been presented”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.