Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 538 A.2d 300 - State v. Whiting

State v. Whiting’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2015

13 state decisions

701988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Barry · State v. True · State v. DeLong · State v. Smith · State v. Pelletier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Giovanini · State v. Boone
  2. “[in] a case involving an alleged sexual offense, evidence of prior or subsequent similar acts between the parties may be admissible to show “the relationship between the parties that in turn sheds light on defendant’s motive (i.e., attraction to the victim), intent (i.e., absence of mistake), and opportunity (i.e., domination of the victim) to commit the crime with which he was charged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Nadeau
  3. “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Giovanini

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.