Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 538 F.2d 1 - United States v. Dauphinee

United States v. Dauphinee’s Empirical Analysis

538 F.2d 1 · 1976

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
10
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 12 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably United States v. Marx (1981), Commonwealth v. Brzezinski (1989)

26 federal appellate · 12 district · 23 state decisions — followed in 10 states

300197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Jones v. United States · United States v. Ventresca · United States v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he officer taking property under the warrant shall give to the person from whom or from whose premises the property was taken a copy of the warrant and a receipt for the property taken or shall leave the copy and receipt at the place from which the property was taken.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Factors like the nature of the criminal activity under investigation and the nature of what is being sought have a bearing on where the line between stale and fresh information should be drawn in a particular case.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “at the most remote date within that time span,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.