United States v. Simpson’s Empirical Analysis
538 F.2d 1377 · 1976
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 656
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Doyle v. Ohio · United States v. Hale · 94 Cal. App. 2d 957 - Caccamo v. Swanston · Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. National Funding Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Property held for another person.” 18 . See U.S. v. Simpson, 538 F.2d 1377, 1379 (9th Cir.1976) (“While the [certificate of ownership] is not conclusive on the issue of title, it is important evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.