United States v. Doulin’s Empirical Analysis
538 F.2d 466 · 1976
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably United States v. Valencia (1979), United States v. Lyles (1979)
35 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Calandra · Costello v. United States · Branzburg v. Hayes · Blair v. United States · Sinclair v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellant’s claim that neither federal grand jury before which he appeared had authority to indict him for the substantive offenses about which he has now been found guilty of lying is, even if true, beside the point. The grand jury’s duty and indeed responsibility to inquire is not coterminous with its power to indict. Id. at 470 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an evidentiary stone in the larger edifice”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.