Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 538 F.2d 63 - Donald F. Garrett v. James B. Bamford, Chairman

Donald F. Garrett v. James B. Bamford, Chairman’s Empirical Analysis

538 F.2d 63 · 1976

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2010 · most notably Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNary (1981), Rosewell v. National Bank (1981)

20 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions

24019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Washington v. Davis · Steffel v. Thompson · Hagans v. Lavine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... it is sufficient for a finding of inadequacy that the availability of the state remedy be merely uncertain.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “district courts shall not enjoin, suspend or restrain the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under State law . . . ,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Where legal remedies require multiple suits involving identical issues against the same defendant, federal equity practice has recognized the inadequacy of the legal remedy and has provided a forum.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.